Speaker summary

⁠86%1 analyzed article/video41 analyzed words

BS Summary: These United States Attorney Daniel N. results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 82 faulty-reasoning hits from 41 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (4,142 of 25,463 speakers). This United States Attorney Daniel N. is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.

United States Attorney Daniel N.

Speaker ranking list

Percentile	Speaker	BS Score
⁠0%	The Brookings Institution	1%
⁠0%	Gen Jack Keane	1%
⁠0%	Shahryar Yadegar	1%
⁠0%	Mike Muse	1%
⁠0%	Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.	1%
⁠84%	United States Attorney Daniel N. (selected)	100%
⁠100%	55th Civil District Court Judge Lotosha Lewis Payne	100%
⁠100%	42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page	100%
⁠100%	314 Action Fund	100%
⁠100%	21 Grams	100%
⁠100%	1X representative	100%

Speaker details

Total words: 41

Article count: 1

Authors

Scott McClallen

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

70th Defendant Pleads Guilty in $250 Million Feeding Our Future Fraud⁠^43%

Townhall⁠^87%By Scott McClallen⁠^26%7/22/2026, 8:00:05 PM