Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United Nations Human Rights Office results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 195 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (3,217 of 18,945 speakers). This United Nations Human Rights Office is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
United Nations Human Rights Office
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠83%United Nations Human Rights Office (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Analyzed articles and videos

CBC | Soccer News⁠13%
CBC⁠46%7/14/2026, 8:49:45 AM