Speaker summary
86%1 analyzed article/video35 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United Nations Human Rights Council results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 35 faulty-reasoning hits from 35 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 84% (3,984 of 24,049 speakers). This United Nations Human Rights Council is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
United Nations Human Rights Council
Speaker details
Total words: 35
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos