Speaker summary
86%1 analyzed article/video49 analyzed words
BS Summary: These UC admissions board results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 98 faulty-reasoning hits from 49 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 85% (4,232 of 26,790 speakers). This UC admissions board is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
UC admissions board
Speaker details