Speaker summary
86%1 analyzed article/video16 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyler James Fhan results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 32 faulty-reasoning hits from 16 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 84% (4,143 of 25,915 speakers). This Tyler James Fhan is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Tyler James Fhan
Speaker details
Total words: 16
Video count: 1
Authors
?