Speaker summary

⁠86%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Turek campaign results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 180 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (3,942 of 24,249 speakers). This Turek campaign is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.

Turek campaign

Speaker ranking list

Percentile	Speaker	BS Score
⁠0%	The Brookings Institution	1%
⁠0%	Gen Jack Keane	1%
⁠0%	Shahryar Yadegar	1%
⁠0%	Mike Muse	1%
⁠0%	Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.	1%
⁠84%	Turek campaign (selected)	100%
⁠100%	5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals	100%
⁠100%	55th Civil District Court Judge Lotosha Lewis Payne	100%
⁠100%	314 Action Fund	100%
⁠100%	21 Grams	100%
⁠100%	1X representative	100%

Speaker details

Total words: 36

Article count: 1

Authors

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Dem Senate hopeful ripped as 'absentee legislator' after missing nearly 60% of votes⁠^76%

Fox News⁠^87%7/21/2026, 1:05:37 PM