Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video34 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump’s Board of Peace results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 102 faulty-reasoning hits from 34 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (9,451 of 40,680 speakers). This Trump’s Board of Peace is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Trump’s Board of Peace
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠77%Trump’s Board of Peace (selected)60%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 34
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510076.8% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos34 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos