Speaker summary
77%1 analyzed article/video32.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Barrett results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 75.9% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 88 faulty-reasoning hits from 32.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 64.8% and a BS Rank of 78% (6,475 of 28,364 speakers). This Tom Barrett is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Tom Barrett
Speaker details