Speaker summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos1,006.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Todd Eddins results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 324.009 hits. Analysis detected 2,016.733 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,006.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (38,303 of 39,609 speakers). This Todd Eddins is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group.
Todd Eddins
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠4%Todd Eddins (selected)6%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 1,006.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751003.3% percentile
5.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Straw Man: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos