Speaker summary
76% 2 analyzed articles/videos 192.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Walberg results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and False Dilemma , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 39.2% saturation with 115 hits . Analysis detected 581.055 faulty-reasoning hits from 192.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (29,941 of 44,242 speakers). This Tim Walberg is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group. Tim Walberg
Speaker details
Total words: 192.333
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.3% percentile 19.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos192.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 39.3% 39.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 27.7% 27.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 23.3% 23.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 37.2% 37.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 41.6% 41.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 41.6%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 39.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 0.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Middle Ground: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst