Speaker summary
76%2 analyzed articles/videos192.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Walberg results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 39.2% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 581.055 faulty-reasoning hits from 192.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (29,941 of 44,242 speakers). This Tim Walberg is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Tim Walberg
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
33%Tim Walberg (selected)20%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 192.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.3% percentile
19.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos192.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 39.3%39.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 27.7%27.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.2%37.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 41.6%41.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 41.6%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 39.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Middle Ground: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos