Speaker summary
59%2 analyzed articles/videos170 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiana Williams-Claussen results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Loss Aversion, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 89.5% saturation with 196 hits. Analysis detected 391 faulty-reasoning hits from 170 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 29.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (14,959 of 28,364 speakers). This Tiana Williams-Claussen is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Tiana Williams-Claussen
Speaker details