Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video73.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Corrigan results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46.2% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 99.327 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (20,024 of 45,123 speakers). This Thomas Corrigan is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Thomas Corrigan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠56%Thomas Corrigan (selected)35%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 73.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
34.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos73.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 43.4%43.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 46.2%46.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.2%14.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 46.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 43.4%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos