Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Orthodox advocacy organization results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 160 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (3,401 of 21,299 speakers). This The Orthodox advocacy organization is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
The Orthodox advocacy organization
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠84%The Orthodox advocacy organization (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 32
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos