Speaker summary
78%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The New York Post editorial board results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Biased Writer Voice, and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.5% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 134 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.6% and a BS Rank of 32% (19,488 of 28,364 speakers). This The New York Post editorial board is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
The New York Post editorial board
Speaker details