Speaker summary
28%1 analyzed article/video199.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tayefur Rahman results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 134 faulty-reasoning hits from 199.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (26,035 of 28,364 speakers). This Tayefur Rahman is better (less manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group.
Tayefur Rahman
Speaker details