Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video34 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Foundation results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 102 faulty-reasoning hits from 34 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,986 of 19,107 speakers). This Tax Foundation is worse (more manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Tax Foundation
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠85%Tax Foundation (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 34
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos