Speaker summary
75%1 analyzed article/video111.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tarah Heinzen results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 71.6% saturation with 79.428 hits. Analysis detected 327.856 faulty-reasoning hits from 111.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.5% and a BS Rank of 62% (16,013 of 41,602 speakers). This Tarah Heinzen is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Tarah Heinzen
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
62%Tarah Heinzen (selected)42%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 111.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.5% percentile
41.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos111.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 69.1%69.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 71.6%71.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 51.0%51.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 32.9%32.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.8%22.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 22.8%22.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.5%20.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 71.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 69.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 51.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos