Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tanya de Grunwald results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 290 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (3,635 of 23,853 speakers). This Tanya de Grunwald is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
Tanya de Grunwald
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠85%Tanya de Grunwald (selected)100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%55th Civil District Court Judge Lotosha Lewis Payne100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos