Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Swansea Crown Court results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 24 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (3,240 of 21,178 speakers). This Swansea Crown Court is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
Swansea Crown Court
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠85%Swansea Crown Court (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 24
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos