Speaker summary
87%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sullenberger results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias and Appeal to Emotion, with Bandwagon as the most egregious example at 69% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 49 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (7,493 of 28,364 speakers). This Sullenberger is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Sullenberger
Speaker details