Speaker summary
60%1 analyzed article/video112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stuart Heritage results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 94.5 hits. Analysis detected 220.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.5% and a BS Rank of 56% (12,440 of 28,126 speakers). This Stuart Heritage is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Stuart Heritage
Speaker details