Speaker summary
81%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Woodside results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 77.4% saturation with 37.161 hits. Analysis detected 37.161 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 77.4% and a BS Rank of 81% (4,797 of 25,128 speakers). This Steven Woodside is worse (more manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Steven Woodside
Speaker details