Speaker summary
79%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Maviglio results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 62.5% saturation with 37.5 hits. Analysis detected 85.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.5% and a BS Rank of 56% (12,520 of 28,364 speakers). This Steve Maviglio is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Steve Maviglio
Speaker details