Speaker summary
81%1 analyzed article/video38 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Dubinett results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Biased Writer Voice, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 73.7% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 140 faulty-reasoning hits from 38 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 73.7% and a BS Rank of 79% (4,333 of 20,114 speakers). This Steve Dubinett is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
Steve Dubinett
Speaker details