Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video150.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Hanse results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 38.9% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 360 faulty-reasoning hits from 150.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (22,753 of 45,081 speakers). This Stephen Hanse is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Stephen Hanse
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠50%Stephen Hanse (selected)30%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 150.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.5% percentile
29.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos150.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 38.9%38.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 37.8%37.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.6%14.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 38.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos