Speaker summary
82%1 analyzed article/video123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Seidmon results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 328.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 123 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.6% and a BS Rank of 48% (14,991 of 28,364 speakers). This Stephanie Seidmon is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
Stephanie Seidmon
Speaker details