Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video94 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Grisham results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 37.2% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 105 faulty-reasoning hits from 94 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,606 of 28,364 speakers). This Stephanie Grisham is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Stephanie Grisham
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠56%Stephanie Grisham (selected)38%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 94
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos