Speaker summary
52%2 analyzed articles/videos466.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Ambriz results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 872.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 466.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,409 of 28,364 speakers). This Stephanie Ambriz is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Stephanie Ambriz
Speaker details