Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video59 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stefania Arteaga results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Pessimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 89.9% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 179 faulty-reasoning hits from 59 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 86.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (7,236 of 45,123 speakers). This Stefania Arteaga is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Stefania Arteaga
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠84%Stefania Arteaga (selected)87%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 59
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

84% percentile
025507510084.0% percentile
86.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos59 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 89.9%89.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 56.5%56.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 89.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 56.5%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos