Speaker summary
90%1 analyzed article/video11 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Department officials results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 11 hits. Analysis detected 44 faulty-reasoning hits from 11 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 87% (5,082 of 37,882 speakers). This State Department officials is worse (more manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
State Department officials
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
87%State Department officials (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 11
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos