Speaker summary
88%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stanford study results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 78 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 86% (3,492 of 23,475 speakers). This Stanford study is worse (more manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
Stanford study
Speaker details