Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stanford Social Innovation Review results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Availability Heuristic, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 36 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (3,245 of 21,655 speakers). This Stanford Social Innovation Review is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
Stanford Social Innovation Review
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠85%Stanford Social Innovation Review (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos