Speaker summary
ā 88%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special Forces results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Recency Bias, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 24 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 87% (4,356 of 31,531 speakers). This Special Forces is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
Special Forces
Speaker details