Speaker summary
40% 12 analyzed articles/videos 313.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spanish government results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Straw Man , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 141 hits . Analysis detected 685 faulty-reasoning hits from 313.667 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (41,895 of 45,134 speakers). This Spanish government is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group. Spanish government
Speaker details
Total words: 313.667
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.2% percentile 7.3% BS Score12 analyzed videos313.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Straw Man: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 0.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst