Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video63 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sonam Wangchuk results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Begging the Question, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 210 faulty-reasoning hits from 63 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (4,813 of 23,148 speakers). This Sonam Wangchuk is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Sonam Wangchuk
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠80%Sonam Wangchuk (selected)75%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%55th Civil District Court Judge Lotosha Lewis Payne100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 63
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos