Speaker summary
83%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Soborof results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Hasty Generalization, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 88.2% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 225 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 88.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (4,229 of 23,148 speakers). This Soborof is worse (more manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Soborof
Speaker details