Speaker summary
41%4 analyzed articles/videos464.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simone Biles results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 575.38 faulty-reasoning hits from 464.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,613 of 28,364 speakers). This Simone Biles is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
Simone Biles
Speaker details