Speaker summary
88%1 analyzed article/video67.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shami Chakrabarti results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Begging the Question, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 337.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 67.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of 81% (5,676 of 29,017 speakers). This Shami Chakrabarti is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
Shami Chakrabarti
Speaker details