Speaker summary
52%1 analyzed article/video88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shalu Yadav results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Composition/Division, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 42.1% saturation with 35.752 hits. Analysis detected 159.752 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.3% and a BS Rank of 45% (24,824 of 45,123 speakers). This Shalu Yadav is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Shalu Yadav
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
45%Shalu Yadav (selected)27%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 88
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.0% percentile
26.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos88 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 39.0%39.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.6%22.6%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.6%22.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 15.9%Composition/Division: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 0.0%No True Scotsman: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos