Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These SFD results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 26 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (19,165 of 43,608 speakers). This SFD is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
SFD
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠57%SFD (selected)36%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 37
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.1% percentile
35.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos37 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 35.1%35.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos