Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seoul Economic Daily results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic and Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 129 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (4,918 of 38,205 speakers). This Seoul Economic Daily is worse (more manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group.
Seoul Economic Daily
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠88%Seoul Economic Daily (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 43
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos