Speaker summary
ā 88%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sen. Chris Van Hollen results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Straw Man, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 172 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 86% (3,559 of 25,463 speakers). This Sen. Chris Van Hollen is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Sen. Chris Van Hollen
Speaker details