Speaker summary
47%1 analyzed article/video53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle NAACP results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Negativity Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 59 faulty-reasoning hits from 53 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.3% and a BS Rank of 37% (18,358 of 28,840 speakers). This Seattle NAACP is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Seattle NAACP
Speaker details
Total words: 53
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos