Speaker summary
48%1 analyzed article/video599.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Weidensaul results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 450 faulty-reasoning hits from 599.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (43,255 of 44,813 speakers). This Scott Weidensaul is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group.
Scott Weidensaul
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
4%Scott Weidensaul (selected)6%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 599.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751003.5% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos599.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.2%8.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 5.4%5.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos