Speaker summary
86%2 analyzed articles/videos78 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Schultz results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 47.4% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 128 faulty-reasoning hits from 78 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 27.4% and a BS Rank of 47% (24,154 of 45,101 speakers). This Schultz is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Schultz
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
47%Schultz (selected)28%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 78
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.4% percentile
27.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos78 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 47.4%47.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.2%37.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 24.4%24.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 2.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos