Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video161.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Satya-Rhodes Conway results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 69.4% saturation with 112.076 hits. Analysis detected 147.076 faulty-reasoning hits from 161.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 46.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (15,756 of 44,911 speakers). This Satya-Rhodes Conway is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
Satya-Rhodes Conway
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠65%Satya-Rhodes Conway (selected)47%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 161.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510064.9% percentile
46.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos161.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 69.4%69.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 23.3%23.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 69.4%, sitewide 26.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos