Speaker summary
77%1 analyzed article/video181.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sandra Stokes results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 552.143 faulty-reasoning hits from 181.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.1% and a BS Rank of 19% (23,186 of 28,364 speakers). This Sandra Stokes is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Sandra Stokes
Speaker details