Speaker summary
51%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sandra Gresl results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 81.5% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 176.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (12,329 of 28,364 speakers). This Sandra Gresl is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Sandra Gresl
Speaker details