Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video61.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sandra results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 59.9% saturation with 85 hits. Analysis detected 143 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,756 of 28,364 speakers). This Sandra is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Sandra
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠41%Sandra (selected)26%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 61.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos