Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video286.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Liccardo results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Loss Aversion, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 59.189 hits. Analysis detected 605.471 faulty-reasoning hits from 286.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,504 of 28,364 speakers). This Sam Liccardo is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group.
Sam Liccardo
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠11%Sam Liccardo (selected)10%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 286.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos